Musing about Murky Markets under the Glow of the Night Sky
by BarryParker
November 11, 2008 12:00 PM

In my blogs, I often talk about the good old days for shipping finance, which combines a timeframe (and actual rates and ship values) with a state of mind (things were simpler then, or something like that). It also meant that much less public or investor scrutiny of the industry, its dynamics and its companies. There was, however, no veneer of transparency then. It was regulators and do-gooders, not investors, who were pushing for whatever transparency did exist.

Like everyone else, I am shell shocked about what’s happened to the equity prices, and think that sellers have driven prices too far downward. But money talks, not the musings of bloggers. Bargain hunters, with cash reserves, will no doubt find some good purchases. Their questions will concern the cost of the carry- when will healthier freights return, and, in turn, when will shares get back to more realistic multiples? It’s “when” , not “if”.

As readers will know from my laments, I sold a bunch of drybulk stocks I had in October, 2007, at the top, but held on some more dividend minded long term employment type shares, and also shifted some money into tankers. At one time, in my commodity broker days, I knew all about “double tops” – probably, I should have gotten the heck out of the other shipping stuff in June 2008.

But investors don’t spend much time distinguishing between companies with more coverage and those with less. The conservative stocks went down as badly as the spot players- following the BDI to the deepest depths- where murkiness is the order of the day. And the tanker stocks I bought failed to respond to one of the strongest markets in quite a while.

The drybulk market is a mess, particularly where freight operators are involved. I suppose the whole “coverage” or “revenue visibility” thing is seen as a red herring, since charterers are seen as weak links. One subset of charterers- the operators, who lease in ships for one or two years, and then put them out on shorter charters to end users (or re-charter to other operators), are the glue that holds the daisy chains together, or not.

When the glue gets diluted, the chains unravel. Right now at least one fellow blogger is attending a gathering of the clans, in London, where participants from the “paper” markets are attempting to sort through an orderly settlement process for various FFA contracts that took extreme plunges. FFAs are a zero sum game, so there is a winner for each loser, but the media looks at that half empty side. Reports in the shipping press are presaging numerous defaults on FFA’s in direct deals, ie the uncleared sector. So, after the shambles are cleaned up, most of the “paper” contracts will be cleared (through LCH Clearnet, Imarex, or even NYMEX if interest is rekindled), a sensible approach that might dissuade some of the market’s riff-raff from returning. Financial investors will add liquidity to the markets, with the credit intermediation that clearing brings.

So, back to murkiness. When I was younger, I was an avid astronomer, and noted that dots visible in the night sky are showing themselves as in the past. Sirius, the bright “Dog Star” visible this time of year in the Southeast in late evenings, is 8.6 light years away, meaning that what I see out there tonight is actually what “Sirius” looked like in the year 2000. 8.6 years ago was before the dotcoms imploded, before China joined the World Trade Organization, and before Capesize rates hit $300,000/day, etc. etc. Financial transparency in shipping is great- I could never write all those cool articles without the SEC filings, and all the great exhibits, like loan agreements in all their glory. But economic transparency, from the biggest shipping market driver, is lacking.

With China- I have a feeling that it’s like astronomy- with time lags of months rather than years, in getting correct actionable information. The shipping markets get data, or the semblance of data, but it’s from the past, it does not seem dynamic. And we all react to it, and, then, there is some different data, and we get head faked in another direction. This is more of a rant than a prescription for doing something about it. The Chinese are big on those double words, like “challenge equals opportunity”. So, in my case, and perhaps for investment types harboring some optimism, maybe “optimism equals foolishness”? I certain hope not. But, I would not the least bit surprised when suddenly a data point emerges from China that contradicts the recent doom and gloom, and gets the charter markets pumping again. It need not be a supernova (an exploding star, or even a post-Olympic bounce). But the optimist in me is hoping for some bit of data to emerge, from an event that might have been occurring at the same time that investors were dumping their FFAs and shipping shares.



Tags:  


Comments (3)
Post a comment


Posted by:  MILESCFA
November 14, 2008 01:28 AM

If you sold your dry stocks at the top, and now wish you sold "double hulled" at the double top, so what are you doing here?

I'm from the investment world - but haven't done anything with shippers (seems most were newly public around 05-06. ergo near the top. Lots of "newly public" is a Wall Street way of telling you it's a top). The BDI sure looks like it should be a bottom, if not now, then soon; but the old Wall Street adage of "don't catch a falling knife" probably applies.

Nonetheless, I just listened to PRGN's 3rd qtr conference call and most of the Wall Street questions were about the dividend sustainability (at 40%+ yield!) and capital liquidity and the possibility of an equity offering (Company wants to take advantage of cheap ships while analysts DON'T want shareholders diluted; one analyst made an interestin contrary point that buying back stock was a "40%+" return... I say, ONLY if the dividend is't cut, so it's a sure sign it will be.).

While I believe the equity offering would be foolish at current stock prices, it certainly seems that PRGN is thinking "challenge equals oppotunity", but so too was DSX when it eliminated it's dividend and saw its stock drop.

Still, the "best info" I heard on the call was that letters of credit were beginning to be released and the CEO thought financing was starting to lossen up. Personally, I think this is "iceberg" news (for the market as a whole!), I just hope I mean "big" and not "big... gonna sink you".

With all this said, I return to my question: "What are you doing here?". It seems you know the business BUT are ready to throw in the towel. That's capitulation, which is what I want to hear, so it makes me think "patience equals opportunity". Patience is "buy and hold", which is exactly what I do NOT do: I trade options and sometimes stocks (but only for a few days). Am I wrong? Is the falling knife going to cut me? If it cuts me, am I going to bleed for a while, or die of  blood loss?

If you choose to answer, why is drybulk such a mess? Surely world trade will continue to grow (ergo, the worlds getting smaller), even if it has a recessionary setback. The only thing I fear is what appears to be a huge amount of capacity coming "online" (and quickly being cancelled) and I'd like your thoughts on that. Thanks.

Posted by:  MILESCFA
November 14, 2008 01:41 AM

PS: Please let me know if you post. My username is my e mail at yahoo. (I'll try to check back, and luckily there only a few blogs here, but with this stock market who knows if I'll remember to check back.) Thanks, Miles
Posted by:  bdp1ConsultingLtd
November 15, 2008 08:35 AM

Well, happily I can respond to others, including Miles, not just to my own blog! I have not thrown in the towel, quite the opposite. I know shipping very well, but making money with stocks requires a knowledge of investor psychology which is more important, at this juncture, to anyone investing in any sector. As outside non-shipping folks come in, and invest, it brings more liquidity, but the outside investors take a more dispassionate view than I do about the prospects for shipping.

As far as my own trades, I did not say that I sold all my dry stocks- I said that when the market got near that first top (Oct 2007) I sold the ones that I felt were likely to track spot rates (which I thought could not be sustained at that time because the marketplace all was valuing forward rates way below spot). The lament comes in because I still believe that the fundamentals of the dry markets will support the market. So for companies with charter coverage, I see steady streams of regular cash coming in, and dividends coming out. Those are the ones I switched into. But the investor psychology plays a much more over-arching role, and the investors in general don't believe that even those stocks will fare well. So I moan and groan.

One view of the markets, which I give serious consideration to, is that they will recover when the huge China versus Brazil conflict, re iron ore pricing, is settled, at least for 2009. On a grand scale, perhaps we are all caught out as these two titans battle to the death. China has a habit of faking out the market, as I have noted, so why not now? As for as charterers defaulting throughout the marketplace, that seems to be middle men, freight operators, so far. The sky is not falling, but disrupted daisy chains can still have a disastorous effect. Solid owners with deals to solid charterers will continue to see regular inflows.

Clearly, drybulk has also the signs of a "bubble". I would characterize the bubble more like a beer with foam on the top. In this "bubble", according to my view, the froth tends to be near the uppermost layer, and there is a lot of solid business further down (solid owners and solid charterers). Yet someone looking at the whole thing would say, oh-that's very frothy (I word I have used in market reports that I have written). So, again, being the industry boosting optimist, I would say that there is a solid market below that wobbly top layer. Precise numbers, I cannot predict, but one must certainly look at costs for vessels as a floor, and the BDI at 800 and something is way way below those floors. So, in my beer glass analogy, I would say that present expectations have us scraping the bottom when we should be perhaps two or three inches down from the top.

And, finally, on order cancellations. I never believed that orders would be cancelled due to the greenfield yard factor, in fact- evidence pointed to owners paying to speed up deliveries. But, the credit issues, post Sept 2008 are a different animal altogether, because they impact the overall economic activity and potential cargo flows. The cancellations have occured and will occur where there is no cargo cover (not in that solid level underneath, to get back to beer glasses).  And if cancellations remove the severe supply overhang, then that would set the stage for a more even balancing.

If you look at players like GNK and DSX- very smart people in both cases, their priority is building up their warchests to find bargains as others bleed out. They are already looking ahead to the inevitable rise. GNK took a hit on some unchartered vessel newbuildings but paid back the debt used for deposits and pointed to their liquidity/ war chest. DSX stopped their dividend, not because of a problem with bank covenants, etc, but because they felt the cash would be more valuable in their warchest.  

 



You must be logged in to post comments.  Log in now or sign up for an account.

    Archives
» November, 2009
» October, 2009
» September, 2009
» August, 2009
» July, 2009
» June, 2009
» May, 2009
» April, 2009
» March, 2009
» February, 2009

Categories
» Baltic Exchange
» Blank Check Companies
» Commodities
» Conference Calls
» Containers
» Drybulk
» Drybulk-London listed
» European Listed Companies
» FFA's
» General Shipping Industry
» Inland Marine Transportation
» LPG-LNG
» LPG/LNG
» Mixed Fleet
» Mixed Fleet-London listed
» New Buildings
» Offshore Transportation
» Oil & Energy
» Presentations
» S&P Market
» Tankers
» Vessel Fixings
» Vessel Fixtures

Shipping Companies Blogs
» Aegean Marine Petroleum (ANW)
» Alexander & Baldwin Inc. (ALEX)
» Alliance Holdings GP, L.P. (AHGP)
» Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP)
» Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. (ANR)
» American Commercial Lines (ACLI)
» AP Moller-Maersk A (MAERSK-A)
» Arcade Acquisition Corp. (ACDQ)
» ArcelorMittal (MT)
» Arch Coal, Inc. (ACI)
» Archer Daniels Midland Company (ADM)
» Aries Maritime (RAMS)
» Atlas Iron Ltd. (AGO.AX)
» Atwood Oceanics Inc. (ATW)
» B & H Ocean (BHO)
» BHP Billiton Ltd. (BHP)
» BP plc (BP)
» Bunge Limited (BG)
» Capital Product Partners (CPLP)
» Chevron Corporation (CVX)
» China Steel Corp. (CISXF.PK)
» Cia. Vale do Rio Doce (RIO)
» Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (SID)
» ConocoPhilillips (COP)
» CONSOL Energy, Inc. (CNX)
» d'Amico International Shipping S.A. (DIS.IT)
» Danaos Corp. (DAC)
» Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. (DO)
» Diana Shipping (DSX)
» Double Hull (DHT)
» DryShips (DRYS)
» Eagle Bulk (EGLE)
» ENI S.P.A. (E)
» Ensco International Inc. (ESV)
» Euroseas (ESEA)
» Excel Maritime (EXM)
» Exxon Mobile Corp. (XOM)
» Fortescue Metal Group (FSUMF.PK)
» Freeseas (FREE)
» Frontline (FRO)
» Genco Shipping (GNK)
» General Maritime (GMR)
» Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL)
» Globus Maritime Ltd (GLBS.L)
» Golar LNG (GLNG)
» Goldenport Holdings (GPRT.L)
» Grupo TMM S.A.B. (TMM)
» GulfMark Offshore, Inc. (GLF)
» Hellenic Carriers Limited (HCL.L)
» Hercules Offshore, Inc. (HERO)
» Horizon Lines, Inc. (HRZ)
» Hornbeck Offshore Services (HOS)
» International Shipholding Corporation (ISH)
» K-SEA Transportation Partners LP (KSP)
» Kirby Corporation (KEX)
» Knightsbridge (VLCCF)
» Natural Resources Partners L.P. (NRP)
» Navios Holdings (NM)
» Navios Maritime Acquisition Corp. (NNA)
» Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM)
» Nippon Steel ADR (NISTY.PK)
» Noble Corp. (NE)
» Nordic American (NAT)
» Nucor Corporation (NUE)
» OceanFreight (OCNF)
» Omega Navigation (ONAV)
» OSG America LP (OSP)
» Overseas Shipholding Group (OSG)
» Paragon Shipping (PRGN)
» Penn Virginia Resource Partners, L.P. (PVR)
» Petrobras Energia Participacion (PZE)
» PetroChina Co Ltd. (PTR)
» POSCO (PKX)
» Pride International Inc. (PDE)
» Repsol YPF, S.A. (REP)
» Rio Tinto plc (RTP)
» Rowan Companies Inc. (RDC)
» Royal Dutch Shell Plc CL ‘B’ (RDS-B)
» Safe Bulkers (SB)
» Seacor Holdings (CKH)
» Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP)
» Seaspan Corp. (SSW)
» Ship Finance (SFL)
» Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK)
» StealthGas (GASS)
» TBS International (TBSI)
» Teekay LNG (TGP)
» Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. (TOO)
» Teekay Shipping (TK)
» Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)
» Tidewater Inc. (TDW)
» Top Ships (TOPS)
» TORM (TRMD)
» Total S.A. (TOT)
» Transocean, Inc. (RIG)
» Tsakos Energy Navigation (TNP)
» Ultrapetrol (ULTR)
» US Shipping Partners LP (USSPZ)
» Xstrata plc (XSRAF.PK)




  ©  Copyright 1996-2009. Capital Link, Inc. All rights reserved.

visit:   www.capitallink.com  |  www.capitallinkcyprus.com  |  www.closedendfundforum.com  |  www.capitallinkforum.com  |  www.irprofiles.com


Disclaimer & Terms Of Use. The information herein is not an offer to buy or sell any kind of securities nor does it constitute investment advice of any kind. Capital Link does not represent or warrant the accuracy of the information in this site. The user of the site acknowledges that he/she accesses the information at his/her own risk and cannot hold Capital Link liable for any matter in any way. Please read full disclaimer and terms of use.